Daily Xen Builds

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Daily Xen Builds

David F Barrera
October 12, 2005 using test changeset:

changeset:   7344:ffbee4415bf7
tag:         tip
user:        emellor@ewan
date:        Wed Oct 12 06:04:45 2005 +0100
summary:     Explicitly state which architectures are going to
use /usr/lib64, to allow for

Last known good changeset* for all platforms: 7069:a172340ae3f3

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES:
        * Bugzilla Bug 302 - Destination host (dom0) of migration
        crashes
        * Bugzilla Bug 317 - Guest domains dying
       

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all FC4 boxes boxes
                * FC4 PAE enabled box: Bug #265 - Time stood still
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
* BUILD BREAK on FC4
 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 265 - Time stood still
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
       
       
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * BUILD BREAK

        ISSUES:
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1] -

     
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   78 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   55 |   33 |     0 |     1 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   56 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
          x305rh4pae |   76 |   11 |     0 |     1 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
          x335fc4pae |   64 |   24 |     0 |     1 |



* With some minor issues with tools, such as 'xm save'.

--
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

FC3pae.report (777 bytes) Download Attachment
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64.report (2K) Download Attachment
hs20.2.sles9-x86_64.report (1K) Download Attachment
hs20.fc4_x86_64.report (2K) Download Attachment
x235sles9nonpae.report (901 bytes) Download Attachment
x305rh4pae.report (856 bytes) Download Attachment
x305sles9nonpae.report (2K) Download Attachment
x335fc4pae.report (1K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Daily Xen Builds

David F Barrera
I need to correct the report. The build break on x86_64 has been
corrected.

The x86_64 section shoul read like this:

x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES:
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1]  

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 13:47 -0500, David F Barrera wrote:

> October 12, 2005 using test changeset:
>
> changeset:   7344:ffbee4415bf7
> tag:         tip
> user:        emellor@ewan
> date:        Wed Oct 12 06:04:45 2005 +0100
> summary:     Explicitly state which architectures are going to
> use /usr/lib64, to allow for
>
> Last known good changeset* for all platforms: 7069:a172340ae3f3
>
> x86_32 (no PAE support)
>
>         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>         * Ran xm-test on all boxes
>         * Ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs
>
>         ISSUES:
>         * Bugzilla Bug 302 - Destination host (dom0) of migration
>         crashes
>         * Bugzilla Bug 317 - Guest domains dying
>        
>
> x86_32 (PAE)
>
>         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
>         ThinkCentre
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>         * Ran xm-test on all FC4 boxes boxes
> * FC4 PAE enabled box: Bug #265 - Time stood still
>         * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
> * BUILD BREAK on FC4
>  
>         ISSUES:  
>         * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
>         * Bugzilla Bug 265 - Time stood still
> * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
>        
>        
> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
>
>         * BUILD BREAK
>
>         ISSUES:
>         * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1] -
>
>      
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------
>
> xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
> tools.
>
> SUMMARY:
>             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
>               FC3pae |   78 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
>  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   55 |   33 |     0 |     1 |
>  hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
>      hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   56 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
>      x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
>           x305rh4pae |   76 |   11 |     0 |     1 |
>      x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
>           x335fc4pae |   64 |   24 |     0 |     1 |
>
>
>
> * With some minor issues with tools, such as 'xm save'.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
--
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Daily Xen Builds

Dan Smith-2
In reply to this post by David F Barrera

Just a comment about these results:

>             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
>               FC3pae |   78 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
>  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   55 |   33 |     0 |     1 |
>  hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
>      hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   56 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
>      x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
>           x305rh4pae |   76 |   11 |     0 |     1 |
>      x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
>           x335fc4pae |   64 |   24 |     0 |     1 |

The above list of PASS/FAIL results was generated with an old version
of xm-test because I forgot to update the link that David pulls from
last night.  In tomorrow's report, we should see fewer failures, and
most marked as expected.

--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: [hidden email]


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Daily Xen Builds

David F Barrera
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 12:36 -0700, Dan Smith wrote:

> Just a comment about these results:
>
> >             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> > ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
> >               FC3pae |   78 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
> >  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   55 |   33 |     0 |     1 |
> >  hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
> >      hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   56 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
> >      x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
> >           x305rh4pae |   76 |   11 |     0 |     1 |
> >      x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
> >           x335fc4pae |   64 |   24 |     0 |     1 |
>
> The above list of PASS/FAIL results was generated with an old version
> of xm-test because I forgot to update the link that David pulls from
> last night.  In tomorrow's report, we should see fewer failures, and
> most marked as expected.
Dan,

Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly more.

SUMMARY*:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   77 |   12 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   60 |   27 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   59 |   28 |     1 |     7 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   78 |   11 |     2 |     6 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
          x305rh4pae |   79 |    9 |     3 |     5 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
>
--
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Daily Xen Builds

Dan Smith-2

DB> Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly
DB> more.

Mostly what I meant was that there are fewer FAILs and more XFAILs,
which there are.  Also, on my machines, I'm seeing almost no
unexpected failures.  See my machine's latest report:

  http://xmtest.dague.org/cgi-bin/display?view=single&testid=99

--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: [hidden email]


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Daily Xen Builds

Ewan Mellor
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:36:25PM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:

>
> DB> Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly
> DB> more.
>
> Mostly what I meant was that there are fewer FAILs and more XFAILs,
> which there are.  Also, on my machines, I'm seeing almost no
> unexpected failures.  See my machine's latest report:
>
>   http://xmtest.dague.org/cgi-bin/display?view=single&testid=99

Looking at this test result, I think that 07_attach_baddevice_neg and
08_attach_bad_filedevice_neg are going to stay XFAIL for some time, but the
patch that I gave you today should sort out the other failures, which will
mean that we pass every other test in your suite.  Which is nice.

This applies to 32-bit, non-PAE, non-SMP Xen -- other architectures will have
different results, at the moment.

Ewan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel